![]() Some of these people, we’re freeing them from the fight, from someone that’s been manipulating them for many, many years. We help people every single week, no matter what we say. There have been quite a few episodes where your research shows that the convicted has likely been untruthful with their own family.Īnderson: People think that because we’re not saying that this person is innocent, we’re not helping. These families often hired private investigators and a law firm, and even they couldn’t find the co-defendants or witnesses. They track down people nobody else can find. Even behind the scenes, the research teams are amazing. I’m so excited to get them because it’s true that these people can’t afford to on their own. Silva: We bring in experts, and they are fantastic. They don’t have the resources to hire attorneys and experts. ![]() The folks on your show are not the Durst family. Television Inside the once-controversial trend that took over true crime TVįrom Netflix’s new ‘Unsolved Mysteries’ to ‘A Wilderness of Error,’ true-crime TV is rife with re-creations. You’re like a living, breathing lie detector test. This is her lane.Ĭhris, when you talk to the accused, your years working homicide really show. She’s pushing to make sure that we get things right, and I appreciate that. In all my years of working homicide cases, I’ve never had anyone that I worked with that required me to see things another way. She pushed back on a lot of the things that we were presenting, and it helped me to be a better investigator. ![]() I think it makes people respect what he does more.Īnderson: I was glad when Fatima came in. He’ll say, “You know what, this was bad police work and I don’t agree with it.” I love that he’s able to come to that conclusion. The nice thing is that Chris is somebody who’s going to bring expertise and do it objectively. Never does a police investigator work with a defense attorney, ever. Silva: It’s really progressive to have two people from sides of the aisle come together. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. Silva and Anderson recently spoke to The Times about their shared mission, their methods and why “Reasonable Doubt” has a “higher calling” than entertainment. Their distinct perspectives are an asset when scrutinizing the many facets of a crime - and engaging the viewer in a series that gives true crime a good name. Silva and Anderson’s skill sets and personalities couldn’t be more different: She’s gregarious and high-energy he’s stoic and laid-back. It’s not only their investigative chops that make for such compelling television, though. “Reasonable Doubt,” which airs Tuesdays and streams on Discovery+, has helped to secure the release of six men from prison - one who was exonerated and five others who were subsequently paroled or their conviction overturned. Poring over the evidence, interviewing key witnesses and consulting experts, the duo ask whether judicial missteps led to an unjust decision - culminating, in each episode, with an emotional reckoning, where Anderson and Silva either provide the family with the hope for an appeal or deliver the hard news that their incarcerated father, son or mother‘s conviction appears sound. In a genre where macabre murders are regularly exploited for entertainment’s sake, the Investigation Discovery series has a higher purpose: Its shrewd, empathetic hosts, retired Birmingham, Ala., homicide detective Chris Anderson and San Francisco criminal defense attorney Fatima Silva, work on behalf of families who feel their loved ones were wrongly convicted. ![]() “Reasonable Doubt” is not your average true-crime docuseries.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |